🔗 Share this article

Out-of-pocket costs. In-network. Out-of-network. Concierge medical services. Personal healthcare costs. Co-payment. Shared insurance. Insurance consultants. Coverage agents. Healthcare consultants. ACA. Health Maintenance Organization. PPO. Exclusive Provider Organization. Point of Service. High Deductible Health Plan. Health Savings Account. Flexible Spending Account. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. Explanation of Benefits. COBRA. Small Business Health Options Program. Single coverage. Dependent coverage. Premium tax credits.

Baffled? You should be. Who comprehends this complex system? Certainly not the average business owner. Nor the typical worker. Choosing the appropriate medical coverage for companies – or for households – appears to require demands a PhD in medical insurance.

The Medical System Isn't Just Complex, It Is Costly

Based on a recent study, typical households pays $27,000 each year for their health insurance (up 6% from last year). Typical employer health insurance cost is expected to exceed $seventeen thousand per employee by 2026, a 9.5% jump from 2025.

Now the government is shut down due to partisan disputes regarding subsidies that experts say could cause premium increases up to 100% for millions of Americans.

When Might We Truly Examine Universal Healthcare?

When will we genuinely evaluate universal healthcare coverage in the United States? I'm convinced we're approaching that point since this can't continue.

I'm not suggesting national healthcare. I'm advocating that our already existing Medicare program – an insurance system – simply expand to include all citizens. The existing system remains intact. The way medical professionals receive payment changes. Believe me, they will adjust.

How Universal Coverage Could Function

A national health insurance program would need payments from both workers and companies. In similar programs, an employee earning average wages pays approximately 5.3% toward medical coverage. The company must contribute approximately thirteen point seventy-five percent.

Does this appear like a lot? Unless you compare that with what average American pays. I know dozens of clients that are easily contributing anywhere from 8% to 15% of their employee wages to their healthcare costs. Remember that in inclusive programs, those payments include pension plans, sick pay, parental benefits and job loss protection along with supporting healthcare facilities. When including those costs compared with what we pay for our retirement plans, job loss coverage and paid time off, the difference decreases.

Implementation in the US

For America, a national health premium would increase existing Medicare taxes, a framework that is already in place. It ought to be means-based – those at higher income levels would contribute higher amounts than those earning less. There would be both worker and employer contribution. And, like much of federal military, IT, social programs and transportation services, the program should be outsourced by private contractors rather than a government office.

Benefits for Small Businesses

A national health insurance program represents a huge benefit for entrepreneurs like mine. It would place us on a level playing field against big corporations that can pay for better plans. It would render administration significantly simpler (automatic payroll withholding remitted like retirement and healthcare taxes, instead of individual transactions to insurance companies and coverage administrators).

It would enable simpler to plan expenses annual expenditures, instead of enduring the complicated (and ineffective) theater of negotiating with the big insurance providers that we must do each year. Because it's simplified, there would be improved comprehension of coverage among workers – contrasted with the current system which require them to interpret the complications of existing plans. Additionally there would definitely exist less liability for employers since we wouldn't have access to workers' medical records for weighing risks and alternative plans.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as capitalist as they get. However I recognize that public institutions play important functions in society, including national security to supporting needed infrastructure. Ensuring medical coverage to all via universal healthcare enhances economic foundations. It's a better, simpler approach for entrepreneurs which hire more than half of American employees and fund half of our GDP. It enables employees to enjoy better health, have better attendance and increase productivity.

Considering Challenges

Exist a million considerations I'm not addressing? Of course there are. But with all the healthcare cost increases we've seen in recent years, it's clear that current healthcare legislation is not working effectively. I understand that America isn't a small, Scandinavian country where major reforms can be readily adopted. But expanding Medicare for all, even with the additional taxes required, would remain a better and more affordable strategy for not only managing medical expenses and ensuring coverage for all citizens.

Need for Realistic Evaluation

As Americans, must reduce our own arrogance. America's medical care isn't exceptional. The US places significantly behind many other countries with the best healthcare in the world, based on comprehensive research. Perhaps a bright spot amid current situation is that we undertake serious examination in the mirror and acknowledge that major reforms are necessary.