🔗 Share this article

Iran is ready to restart atomic talks with Washington as long as it is approached with "dignity" and "respect", Tehran's foreign minister has declared.

Abbas Araghchi declared solely negotiations worked, and shared fresh requests had originated from intermediaries to restart discussions with the American leadership. He claimed Iran had zero secret atomic facilities, and Iran had not yet reached a point to allow the global atomic watchdog to access bombed nuclear sites for protective measures.

Walking a Complex Course

Araghchi is navigating a difficult route since Iran does not want appear to be operating from a position of weakness, and he insisted repeatedly that Iran had arisen stronger militarily and psychologically from the coordinated strike on its enrichment centers in June.

He was addressing at a security conference in Tehran where he reiterated that Iran had "an absolute privilege to enrich uranium on home soil that it will always maintain" – the key factor of the deadlock in the prior discussions.

Earlier Discussions Unexpectedly Ended

The prior phases of negotiations between the US and Iran were brought to an abrupt and hostile termination on 12 June when Israel, with American backing, struck Iranian nuclear sites in a two-week conflict that ended with Donald Trump asserting the locations had been eliminated. Subsequently, EU nations employed their right to reinstate international penalties, but Iran insists they have not had a substantial consequence.

Magic Solution Offered

Tehran representatives stated they felt they had achieved a "magic solution" to the uranium processing matter in prior discussions, when it was agreed an Iran-based consortium with Washington's engagement could enrich uranium. The two nations would have been able to assert triumph since domestic enrichment would have remained and the US could be confident that Iran's atomic project was solely for peaceful purposes.

It had not been decided in the negotiations that Washington's technical specialists could function on Iranian soil, but that was a natural consequence of the consortium proposal. Representatives stated three times they had achieved a deal with Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff only for the deal to fall apart due to "opponents in the US".

Present Status

Tehran representatives declared the cooperative arrangement was now withdrawn, but it seems highly likely the suggestion could be revived in various formats if negotiations restart.

Trump recently said he had been getting signals that Iran sought to resume discussions, but confidentially Iranian officials state they are not yet receiving coherent offers from Washington either directly or from important Middle Eastern intermediaries, such as Qatar, the Egyptian leadership, the Omani authorities and the Saudi kingdom. The Tehran's diplomatic corps has been charged of inactivity in the aftermath of the US president's straightforward manner, but Iran says dialogue is not part of a performance.

Diplomatic Stance

In his speech to the gathering, aimed to paint the US as a controlling nation that exploits the notion of worldwide standards, Araghchi said the 12-day war showed the clash could not be ended by military means. He asserted the strikes commenced with a US demand for an complete Tehran capitulation and ended with an complete request for a halt to hostilities.

Iran is certain the opening assaults from Tel Aviv were executed with complete American awareness and coordination, making confidence hard to rebuild.

Diplomacy Stays the Final Answer

The foreign minister stated: "It was not Iran that had fled dialogue; it was the United States and the western countries that had always tried to impose their desires during the talks. Diplomacy can still be alive and continues the final resolution to settle disputes, but its criteria, regulations and fundamentals must be adhered to."

"Provided that they talk to the nation of Iran with the approach of respect and honor, they will get a response in the same tone."

Recovery and Recovery

In what is characterized by Iran's diplomats as the battle of recovery and recovery, the foreign minister said he was assured Iran's military capacities "are much stronger than before 13 or 14 June of this year. Our entire military infrastructure have been reestablished. We acquired multiple understandings from this conflict; we have discovered our personal limitations and the weaknesses of the opponent."

He continued: "We managed to survive this engagement. Our atomic expertise, which they planned to obliterate, continues to exist. The sites and gear, if destroyed, will be reconstructed; what is crucial is the determination of the Iranian people and then the social solidarity that they aimed at, but were unable to destroy. The citizens of Tehran have developed more powerful, more united, and more endorsing of the administration and the state in the face of this invasion."