🔗 Share this article

Just 48 hours before the NYC mayoral election, Michael Lange made a bold electoral prediction – not just who would win overall, but block by block. The analyst, an expert in elections who grew up in New York City, devoted over a decade in progressive politics and has become a kind of well-known figure recently for his thorough analyses into city data and polling.

He published his extremely precise prediction map – which correctly forecast that the progressive candidate would win while failed to predict Andrew Cuomo’s solid showing – on his newsletter, the Narrative War. Lange has a flair for clever terms. He pointed out, for instance, the divide between the progressive stronghold, running from one neighborhood to Bushwick to a third locale, where he forecasted (correctly) that the left-wing candidate would triumph by large leads, and the conservative-leaning zone on Manhattan’s Upper East and Upper West Sides. In those areas, “the Free Press and financial newspapers surpass the mainstream paper” in audience and the majority of electors leaned toward the independent, who ran as a moderate alternative.

Voting Day Trends and Surprises

What was your night?

It was necessary because they were dropping approximately 200K votes into the tally frequently! I felt somewhat anxious initially: Mamdani was ahead the early vote by 12 points, but there were large groups of votes that came in later and his lead dropped from 12 to 8%. It was concerning.

Understand, it was possible where yesterday went kind of poorly for him, in which the opponent was going to end up basically doubling his votes from the Democratic primary. But the winner added 500,000 votes to his initial base, and that’s a huge reason why he won. He campaigned and greatly broadened his base from the primary.

Coalition Building

How did Mamdani get those extra votes from?

He built the alliance that the left always wanted to build: diverse racially, it’s young, tenants and individuals facing cost pressures. He improved significantly with Black and Hispanic voters, working- and middle-class voters, relative to the earlier election. Plus he further maximized his core of liberal progressives, youthful radicals, and Muslims and south Asians. Victory required without expanding his appeal.

He built the alliance that progressives long aimed for: diverse, young, renters and people struggling with costs

There were also some Trump/Mamdani voters – is that a big trend?

It’s definitely a real thing, confined to Hispanic laborers, south Asians and Islamic voters. Electors in immigrant strongholds that went for the former president last year backed the progressive now. But it’s not that he was winning over white working-class voters and Maga voters.

Voter Participation and Effects

One of the big stories of the night was the record participation. Who benefited?

Both sides. Participation was significantly higher than I had expected. I thought we might exceed 2 million, but it’s closer to 2.3M – that is a lot of darn voters. There was a substantial anti-Mamdani block, energized, but the Mamdani base was also motivated, and that was enough to secure victory.

You predicted he’d exceed half the ballots. Is he on course for that?

Currently it appears he’s likely to surpass 50%. He has just over 50% but there’s still probably 200,000 votes left to report at that time. So I don’t think certain, but I think it’s likely, and I hope he does so afterwards none can claim Sliwa was a disruptor.

Republican Collapse

The GOP candidate, the conservative contender, is the other big story. His support plummeted.

He didn’t win any district in any borough. Not even one neighborhood in Staten Island, which is like an 88% Trump neighborhood. That truly surprised me. The independent kept very white areas, very wealthy areas and very religiously Jewish areas, and plus gained all of these conservatives on Staten Island with a high participation. I think occurred a lot of tactical voting by the Republicans. They were doing it before the former president endorsed for the candidate, but it assisted. It might have changed the outcome if Mamdani’s coalition failed to expand.

The “Commie Corridor”

What about your much mentioned left-wing base – did backing for Mamdani dominant in those parts of the boroughs?

I think there was some weakening of the commie corridor in some areas like neighborhoods that have older Caucasian residents. There, for example, the Greek landlords and residents supported Cuomo. So there was a little resistance. However no, largely the leftist base is another huge reason why Zohran won – he scored between 77% and 83% in specific neighborhoods.

Jewish Voters

Prior to the vote we reported on if Mamdani was gaining ground with the community. Any indication that he succeeded?

There are areas with many secular and more progressive-leaning Jews – such as Park Slope and Morningside Heights – where he performed strongly. But in the affluent districts like the Manhattan area, his position on Israel definitely mattered there. Similarly in the more middle-class Jewish areas including Forest Hills, Rego Park, or Spuyten Duyvil and Riverdale – they all leaned Cuomo. And also, you have Jewish immigrants from the former Soviet Union in the borough, who were pretty staunchly supportive. Therefore I don’t know if existed major surprises on this one, but he did hold left-leaning areas and even parts of the another locale with large leads.

Political Impact

Has Mamdani rewritten what New York means politically? Will the progressive base become a launch pad for progressive contenders?

Yes, it’s no coincidence that some of the biggest political leaders from the left hail from a few areas in the boroughs. I’m sure that there will be more of that – candidates will emerge from these areas to be elevated nationally.

But I think that each urban center in America can have their own commie corridor. Urban places are the centers of progressive influence in America – since youth reside there, people rent and they represent locales where people are crushed by the disparities we face.